Manafort filing download

The order will require that defendant remain at his Bridgehampton home at all other times, and he will continue to be subject to GPS monitoring. There will be no last minute additions to the schedule.

Defendant will be permitted to attend specific events at times and locations to be identified in a sealed order. Sullivan on December 20, and Judge Amy B. Defendant Gates will be permitted to attend specific events at times and locations to be identified in a sealed order.

The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal the attachment, Exhibit 1 [] to defendant Gates's motion, and is also directed to unseal the motion for leave to file document under seal itself.

In his motion 98 to modify conditions of release, defendant Gates identifies certain relatives as potential sureties under 18 U. Defendant Gates must inform the Court whether these individuals are simply being proposed in connection with the forfeiture of the properties, or if he is asking the Court to consider them as sureties under subsection xii.

If he is proffering them as sureties, he must inform the Court when he intends to supplement his submission with the necessary "information regarding the value of the assets and liabilities of [a] surety Also, defendant must address the question of whether he is legally permitted to agree to forfeit assets held in plans and individual retirement accounts, and if so, what effect any consequent taxes and penalties would have on the value of those accounts.

The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal [] the government's response to defendant Gates's motion to modify conditions of release.

The Clerk of Court is also directed to unseal the motion for leave to file under seal. Date of Issuance: December 20, The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal defendant's [] Reply to the government's response to motion to modify conditions of release as well as [] Exhibit 1 attached thereto.

Defendant Gates is ORDERED to file a redacted version of his Reply on the public docket since only limited portions of the motion refer to private financial information. As to defendant Gates's request for the Court to reconsider its order regarding Christmas holiday events, defendant will be permitted to substitute the requested event for the event he was permitted to attend in the Court's previous order.

The times and locations of the events will be identified in a sealed order. Defendant Gates is ORDERED to show cause by December 27, why the Court should not find that his reported personal participation in the creation of a fundraising video to be shown to journalists and disseminated on social media, in which, according to multiple press accounts, defendant makes reference to "the cause" and the goal of "ensuring that our supporters from across the United States hear our message and stand with us," would not violate this Court's order 38 of November 8, Defendant must also explain the nature of his relationship, if any, with Jack Burkman, who reportedly publicly characterized the prosecution as " very unfair" at a December 19, fundraising event to which journalists were invited, and indicate whether Burkman's comments are being made at his direction or the direction of his counsel.

The Court emphasizes that it is not intimating that the creation of a legal defense fund or the expression of personal views by third parties not acting at the behest of the defense would violate its order. On December 18, , in connection with its ruling on defendant Gatess request to attend his childs Christmas concert, the Court issued the following order: "Any and all additional Christmas-related requests must be filed in one pleading by December 20, so that the Court can rule on them at one time by Friday, December 22, The motion was granted in part and denied in part on December 20, and the Court's order included this admonition: "There will be no additions or changes to this schedule.

After all of that, on December 28, , defendant Gates filed yet another motion , with a new plan for New Year's celebrations. But the Court's original order was designed to ensure that any requests would be filed at a time when they could be reviewed and processed in accordance with all of the arcane procedures involved in the docketing and transmittal of sealed orders, which cannot be handled electronically.

Given the untimely filing of the current motion, it will be denied. Docket entry 84 is the correct entry. In light of the matters discussed at the status conference on January 16, , the Court will defer further communication with counsel concerning a trial date until closer to the next status conference.

There is a schedule in place for the filing of motions under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 b 3 A and B , and the Court will establish a schedule for the filing of additional pretrial motions, including any motion for a bill of particulars pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7 f , motions to suppress statements of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 b 3 C , and motions to sever charges or defendants under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 b 3 D and 14, at this time.

Defendants' motions must be filed by April 6, ; oppositions are due on April 23, ; and replies are due on May 4, A hearing on the motions is scheduled for May 23, at AM in Courtroom 3 to be carried over until May 24, if necessary. The government's notice of its intention to introduce any evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence b is also due on April 6, ; oppositions are due on April 23, ; and any reply is due on May 4, The hearing on this issue is also set for May 23, Motions in limine to exclude evidence at trial pursuant to the Federal Rules of Evidence will be due approximately weeks before trial, and the dates for filing and opposing those motions will be set in connection with the scheduling of the trial, the Pretrial Conference, and the filing of the Joint Pretrial Statement.

The parties must notify the Court if they have any objections to this schedule as a whole by January 19, Date of Issuance: January 17, The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal [] defendant's motion for reconsideration of conditions of release. The Court held a sealed hearing this date on defendant's Sealed Motion for reconsideration. The matter remains under advisement pending the supplementation of the motion by the defendant. Defendant Manafort's motion for leave to file an opposition to the government's motion to modify the schedule for Rule b notice and briefing is DENIED as moot.

Neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Court's Local Rules require a party to file a motion for leave to file an opposition to an opposing party's motion, although the local rules do establish a due date for any opposition.

The Court does not intend to rule on the government's motion until that time has elapsed. In addition, in light of any misunderstanding of the terms of the minute order dated January 17, , it is hereby ORDERED that defendants may notify the Court of any objections they have to the schedule established in the order by January 29, The Clerk of Court is directed to remove from the public docket the document attached as [] to defendant's motion for leave to file.

The Clerk of Court is then directed to file [] in its place as the proposed order to defendant's motion for leave to file. The Court reporter may provide the government with a copy of the transcript from the sealed hearing on January 22, The government must inform the Court of its position on defendant Manafort's motion for leave to file document under seal by February 13, The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal defendant Manafort's [] supplemental filing to his motion for reconsideration of conditions of release, as well as the attachments to that filing [] [] [] [] [] [].

Defendant Manafort must file a redacted version of his [] supplemental memorandum on the public docket, but financial information and addresses may remain under seal. The Clerk of Court is also directed to unseal the motion for leave to file document under seal itself.

The government is ORDERED to notify the Court if it has any objection to [] defendant Manafort's supplemental memorandum to his motion for reconsideration of conditions of release by February 13, The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal [] the government's response to defendant Manafort's supplemental filing to his motion for reconsideration of conditions of release.

The government must file a redacted version of its [] response on the public docket by February 16, , but financial information and addresses may remain under seal. Defendant Manafort 1 must supplement the Motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal defendant Manafort's [] second supplemental filing to his motion for reconsideration of conditions of release, as well as the attachments to that filing.

Defendant Manafort must file a redacted version of his [] second supplemental memorandum on the public docket, but financial information and addresses may remain under seal.

The Court reporter may provide the government with a copy of the transcript from the hearing on February 14, , with the exception of sealed portions of the transcript that reflect the sealed portion of the hearing related to the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by defendant Gates's counsel, to which the government was not a party.

The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal the government's [] response to defendant Manafort's second supplemental filing to his motion for reconsideration of conditions of release. The government must file a redacted version of its [] response to defendant's second supplemental memorandum on the public docket, but financial information and addresses may remain under seal.

While it remains the Court's ruling that in order to be relieved of the condition of home confinement, defendant may supply either security under 18 U. Subsection xi calls for the execution of "an agreement to forfeit Upon review of that information, the Court has determined that in the absence of additional security or assets pledged by a surety, it will not accept as security the Alexandria property that has already been pledged in its entirety as collateral for the loan on the Bridgehampton property.

The filing from Mueller's office in November accusing Manafort of violating the plea agreement alleged that Manafort lied to federal investigators "on a variety of subject matters. Manafort reached a plea agreement with Mueller's office on Sept. District Court. Under the deal, Manafort pledged "to cooperate fully, truthfully, completely, and forthrightly" with Mueller's probe and any other investigation.

Manafort allegedly shared data with Russian operative. Grace Segers. Please enter email address to continue. Please enter valid email address to continue. The least redacted portion of the document says Manafort downplayed Kilimnik's involvement with a witness-tampering effort to which Manafort pleaded guilty. Attached to the filing is a page packet of evidence that supports the allegations, though that packet is just as heavily redacted as the main filing.

Having been convicted of eight counts of tax and bank fraud in Virginia in August, Manafort later pleaded guilty to separate charges in Washington, D. Tuesday's submission is a step towards his sentencing on those charges. Manafort's attorneys filed their response to allegations that Manafort breached his plea agreement last week, though botched redactions in the filing revealed Mueller believes Manafort passed Trump campaign polling data to foreign contacts.

Redacted Filing Backs Up Claims of Manafort Lies to Feds A federal judge on Tuesday unsealed a page filing that details alleged lies former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort told the government about his financial dealings, interactions with an accused Russian spy and contacts with members of the Trump administration.